EFFECT OF DIFFERENT STYLE ELEMENTS ON STUDENT'S IDENTITY IN THE DESIGN

Document Type : Specialized scientific research papers

Author

Architectural Engineering – Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT)

10.47436/jaarsfa.v1i1.23

Abstract

Egypt is home to great civilizations with special, identifiable heritage elements that represent aesthetic and visual values. Due to the overwhelming influence of Western conceptions, their use in design has been fading. In the scope of this paper, students’ experiences based on the project subjects in interior design course at the department of Architecture at AASTMT in the spring term of 2018-2019 were analyzed. The survey conducted with students revealed that students worked cooperatively, learned to create designs by focusing on style, historical themes, function and environmental conditions. This research aims to monitor and measure the extent of modern visions and trends in the students’ interior designs extent by focusing the effect of the pedagogy on designs with heritage elements.   Its goal is to expand the individual student’s understanding of this heritage, while elucidating the influence heritage elements as well as modern trends on their designs creative thinking development.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Alexander, Christopher. Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, (1964).
Broadbent, Geoffrey. Design in Architecture: Architecture and the Human Sciences. London: John Wiley and Sons, (1973)
Brooker, G., & Stone, S. (2004). Rereading: Interior architecture and the design principles of remodeling existing buildings. London: RIBA Enterprises.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd edn ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Dutton, T. A. (1987). Design and Studio Pedagogy. Journal or Architectural Education, 41.
Embaby, M. (2014). Heritage conservation and architectural education: “An educational methodology for design studios”. HBRC Journal Heritage conservation and architectural education: “An educational methodology for design studios”. HBRC Journal
Franz, J. (2007a). Arts-based research in design education. Qualitative Research Journal, 7.
Gust, D., & Moore, T. A. (1985). A synthetic system mimicking the energy transfer and charge separation of natural photosynthesis. Journal of Photochemistry, 29(1-2), 173-184.
Kellert, S., Heerwagen, J., & Mador, M. (2008). Biophilic design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. Hoboken, N.J., Wiley
Massey, Anne 1990, Interior Design of the 20th Century. London: Thames Hudson.
McAuliffe, M. (2007) Considering the role of presence in the conceptual design of interior architectural Environments. 10th Annual International Workshop on Presence, Barcelona, Spain.
Nicol, D., & Pilling, S. (2000). Architectural education and the profession. In D. Nicol & S. Pilling (Eds.), Changing Architectural Education: Towards a New Profession (pp. 1-22). London: E & F N Spon.
Peter L. Laurence. (2014). “Modern (or Contemporary) Architecture circa 1959,” A Critical History of Contemporary Architecture
Poldma, T. (2015). Engaging voices within a dynamic problem-based learning context. In J. A. A. Thompson & N. Blossom (Eds.), The handbook of interior design. West Sussex: JohnWiley & Sons Ltd.
Pontis, S. (2010) Types and approaches of (design) research. Mapping Complex In formation blog. Available at: http://sheilapontis.wordpress.com/2010/11/05/types-and-approaches-of-design-research.
Stevens, G. (1998). The favored circle: The social foundations of architectural distinction. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rengel, R. (2007). Shaping Interior Space (2nd ed.). United States of America:Fairchild Publications
Veldpaus, L. (2015). Historic urban landscapes: framing the integration of urban and heritage planning in multilevel governance. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.